| P2465 Attention & Perception Reading Assignments and Review | Notes | |||||||||||||||||||
| Jump To December on outline | Last Update 10/31/08 | |||||||||||||||||||
| To Get Reviews Click on the Reference Below for Full Biblography, Students are requried to read the Priority 1 required Priority 2 recommended, 3 background reference | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Date | JumpTo | Day | Lec | Continuation | Topic | Priority | Reviewer | ID | Missing | H | oH | L | Pages | 3R | Perception & Attention Readings | |||||
| 26-Aug | Tue | 1 | Overview | 1 | Walt Schneider | 1 | H | 34 | P | Pashler Introduction to Attention & Perception 1-34 | ||||||||||
| 26-Aug | Tue | 1 | c | Overview | 3 | Walt Schneider | 2 | 51 | P | Pashler Selective Attention 37-98 Good overvview of selective attention | ||||||||||
| 28-Aug | Thu | 2 | Attention Overview | 1 | Walt Schneider | 3 | H | 71 | P | Shiffrin, R. M. (1988). Attention. In R. C. Athkinson & R. J. Herrnstein & G. Lindzey & R. D. Luce (Eds.), Stevens' Handbook of Experimental Psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 739-811). New York: Wiley. (limit reading ??-??) figures on rest | ||||||||||
| 2-Sep | Tue | 3 | Model Overview CAP2 | 1 | Walt Schneider | 4 | L | 30 | P | Schneider, W., & Chein, J. M. (2003). Controlled and automatic processing: behavior, theory and biological mechanisms. Cognitive Science. | ||||||||||
| 4-Sep | Thu | 4 | Normal Life | 1 | Walt Schneider | 5 | H | 35 | P | R | Reason, J. (1984). Lapses of attention in everyday life. Varieties of attention. Parasuraman, R., & Davies, D. R. (Eds.). Academic Press, Inc, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers, NY: pp 515-549. | |||||||||
| 9-Sep | Tue | 5 | Attention Search | 1 | Walt Schneider | 6 | 23 | p | Wright & Ward 2008 Ch 3 Properties of attentional focal Point | |||||||||||
| 9-Sep | Tue | 5 | c | Attention Search | 2 | Walt Schneider | 7 | 15 | p | Wright & Ward 2008 Ch 2Studying Attentional Shifts with location Cueing | ||||||||||
| 11-Sep | Thu | 6 | Method: Additive Factors methods | 1 | Walt Schneider | 8 | 25 | P | Sternberg, S. (1969) The discovery of processing states: Extension of Donders’ Methods. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276-315 | |||||||||||
| 11-Sep | Thu | 6 | c | Method: Additive Factors methods | 3 | Walt Schneider | 9 | 99 | Sternber,S (2001) Separate modifiability, mental modules, and the use of pureand composite measures to reveal them. Acta Psychologica, 106, 147-246, 2001 | |||||||||||
| 11-Sep | Thu | 6 | c | Method: Additive Factors methods | 3 | Walt Schneider | 10 | P | McClelland, J. L., (1979) On the Time Relations of Mental Processes: An Examination of Systems of Processes in Cascade Psychology Review 86, 287-330 | |||||||||||
| 11-Sep | Thu | 6 | c | Method: Additive Factors methods | 3 | Walt Schneider | 11 | P | Logan, G. D., (1995) The Weibull distribution, the power law, and the instance theory of automaticity Psychological review 102, 751-756 | |||||||||||
| 11-Sep | Thu | 6 | c | Method: Reaction Time Procedures | 1 | Walt Schneider | 12 | 11 | P | Reaction Time Procedures Serial Parallel Processing Massaro Ch 7 | ||||||||||
| 16-Sep | Tue | 7 | Computerized experimentation E' | 1 | Walt Schneider | 13 | 58 | P | E-Prime Implementations of Attention & Percepton Experiments selected pages (11-68) | |||||||||||
| 18-Sep | Thu | 8 | E-Prime - precise timing | 3 | Walt Schneider | 14 | 14 | P | Precise Timing in computerized experiments (71-85) | |||||||||||
| 23-Sep | Tue | 9 | E-Prime use of computer code | 1 | Walt Schneider | 15 | 41 | P | Using code to operate experiments | |||||||||||
| 25-Sep | Thu | 10 | Method: Statistical Power | 1 | Walt Schneider | 16 | 52 | P | Cohen, J. (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the behavioral sciences (2ed) Hillsdale, NJ. 1-72 (required 19-71) | |||||||||||
| 25-Sep | Thu | 10 | c | Method: Statistical Power | 3 | Walt Schneider | 17 | 53 | P | Cohen ANOVA statistical power, Notes on ANOVA power required | ||||||||||
| 30-Sep | Tue | 11 | Method: d' detection sensitivity | 1 | Walt Schneider | 18 | L | 5 | P | Measures of detection accuray, d' (graphing tool, spreadsheet calculator) | ||||||||||
| 30-Sep | Tue | 11 | c | Method: d' detection sensitivity | 1 | Walt Schneider | 81 | C | 11 | P | Klein, Raymond M. (2006) Inhibition of Return: Sensitivity and Criterion as a Function of Response TimJournal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance. 32(4):908- 919 | |||||||||
| 30-Sep | Tue | 11 | c | Statistical analysis of RT | 1 | Walt Schneider | 82 | 11 | X | Analyziing data in R/SPSS | ||||||||||
| 2-Oct | Thu | 12 | Eye Movements | 1 | Kai | 21 | H | 31 | P | Wright & Ward 2008 Ch 6 Eye Movements and Attention Shifts | ||||||||||
| 2-Oct | Thu | 12 | c | Eye Movements | 3 | 19 | x | .L | 34 | P | Hoffman, J. E. (1998). Visual Attention and Eye Movements. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Attention (pp. 119-153). San Diego: Psychology Press. | |||||||||
| 2-Oct | Thu | 12 | c | Eye Movements | 2 | Kai | 20 | H | .L | 16 | P | Findlay, J. M. & Walker, R, (1999) A model of saccade generation based on parallel processing and competitive inhibition, Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 22, 661–721 | ||||||||
| 2-Oct | Thu | 12 | c | Eye Movements | 2 | Nikole | 21 | H | H | .L | 35 | P | Gersch, T. M., Kowler, E & Dosher, B (2004) Dynamic allocation of visual attention during the execution of sequences of saccades. Vision Research, 44, 1469-1483 | |||||||
| 2-Oct | Thu | 12 | c | Eye Movements | 3 | 22 | H | .L | 9 | P | Merriam ER, Colby CL (2005) Active vision in parietal and extrastriate cortex. Neuroscientist. 11 (5): 484-493 | |||||||||
| 7-Oct | Tue | 13 | Icon | 1 | Tom | 23 | H | H | .L | 26 | P | Reeves, A., & Sperling, G. (1986). Attention gating in short-term visual memory. Psychological Review, 93, 180-206. (Skip Math){Just main concepts of gate opening, nature of shutting, and lack of order conding. | ||||||||
| 9-Oct | Thu | 14 | Search & Selection | 2 | Aarthi | 24 | H | H | .L | 6 | P | Wood, N., & Cowan, N. (1995b). The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: How frequent are attention shifts to one’s name in an irrelevant auditory channel? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 255-260. | ||||||||
| 9-Oct | Thu | 14 | c | Onsets, changes, dual task | 1 | Dan | 34 | H | H | .L | 14 | P | Yantis, S., & Jonides, J. (1990). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Voluntary versus automatic allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 121-134. | |||||||
| 14-Oct | Tue | 15 | NO CLASS TODAY IS A MONDAY ON THE UNIVERSITY CALLENDER | |||||||||||||||||
| 16-Oct | Thu | 16 | Exam | MidTerm Exam | ||||||||||||||||
| 21-Oct | Tue | 17 | Individual Differences | 1 | Aarthi | 25 | H | H | .L | 16 | P | R | Wickens & McCarely 2008 Ch 10 Individual Differences in Attention 161-177 | |||||||
| 21-Oct | Tue | 17 | c | Fluid intellegence | 1 | Dan | 83 | H | H | .L | 4 | P | Jaeggi 2008 PNAS Improving
fluid intelligence with training on working memory |
|||||||
| 21-Oct | Tue | 17 | c | Fluid Intellegence | 2 | Dan | 84 | H | .L | 2 | P | Sternberg, R 2008 Commentary | ||||||||
| 23-Oct | Thu | 18 | Search & Selection | 1 | Jooyoung | 26 | H | H | .L | 19 | P | R | Treisman, A., & Sato, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 459-478. | |||||||
| 23-Oct | Thu | 18 | c | Search & Selection | 3 | 27 | H | .L | 34 | P | Treisman, A., & Gormican, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review, 95, 14-48. | |||||||||
| 23-Oct | Thu | 18 | c | Search & Object | 3 | 28 | H | .L | 26 | P | R | Vogel, E. K., Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2001). Storage of features, conjunctions, and objects in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 92-114. | ||||||||
| 28-Oct | Tue | 19 | Search & Object | 2 | Dan | 29 | H | H | .L | 44 | P | R | Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., & Gibbs, B. (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 175-219. | |||||||
| 28-Oct | Tue | 19 | c | Search & Object | 1 | Tom | 30 | H | H | .L | 6 | P | Hommel, B. (2004). "Event files: feature binding in and across perception and action." Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8(11): 494-500. | |||||||
| 28-Oct | Tue | 19 | c | Onsets, changes, dual task | 3 | 32 | H | .L | 31 | P | Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353-383. | |||||||||
| 28-Oct | Tue | 19 | c | Onsets, changes, dual task | 3 | 33 | H | .L | 58 | P | Navon, D., & Miller, J. (2002). Queing or sharing? A critical examination of the single- bottleneck notion. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 193-251. | |||||||||
| 28-Oct | Tue | 19 | c | Onsets, changes, dual task | 1 | Kristine | 34 | H | H | .L | 14 | P | R | Yantis, S., & Jonides, J. (1990). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Voluntary versus automatic allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 121-134. | Do not repeat a second time Kristie late | |||||
| 28-Oct | Tue | 19 | c | Onsets, changes, dual task | 3 | 35 | H | .L | 21 | P | R | Yantis, S., & Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 601-621. | ||||||||
| 30-Oct | Thu | 20 | Change Blindness | 1 | Nikole | 36 | L | H | .L | 6 | P | R | Levin, D. T., & Simons, D. J. (1997). Failure to detect changes to attended objects in motion pictures. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 501-506. | Remember to bring in videos, and show Neisser on Simon web site | ||||||
| 30-Oct | Thu | 20 | c | Change Blindness | 3 | 37 | H | .L | 15 | P | R | Levin, D. T., Momen, N., Drivdahl, S. B., & Simons, D. J. (2000). Change blindness blindness: The metacognitive error of overestimating change-detection ability. Visual Cognition, 7, 397-412. | ||||||||
| 30-Oct | Thu | 20 | c | Change Blindness | 2 | Nikole | 38 | L | H | .L | 15 | P | R | Simons, D. J. (2000). Current Approaches to Change Blindness. Visual Cognition, 7, 1-15. | ||||||
| 4-Nov | JumpTo | Tue | 21 | Task Switching | 1 | Aarthi | 39 | H | H | .L | 6 | P | Monsel, S (2003) Task Switching, TRENDS is Cognitive Science, 7, 134-140 | |||||||
| 4-Nov | Tue | 21 | c | Task Switching | 2 | Dan | 40 L | H | H | .L | 44 | P | R | Meiran, N., Chorev, Z., & Sapir, A. (2000). Component processes in task switching. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 211-253. | dan late | |||||
| 6-Nov | Thu | 22 | Inhibition & Stroop | 1 | Kai | 41 | H | H | .L | 51 | P | R | MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109(2), 163-203. | |||||||
| 6-Nov | Thu | 22 | c | Inhibition & Stroop | 2 | Nikole | 42 | H | H | .L | 16 | P | R | Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception and Psychophysics, 40, 225-240. | ||||||
| 6-Nov | Thu | 22 | c | Inhibition & Stroop | 2 | Aarthi | 43 | H | H | .L | 19 | P | R | Eriksen, C. W. (1995). The flankers task and response competition: A useful tool for investigating a variety of cognitive problems. Visual Cognition, 2, 101-118. | ||||||
| 11-Nov | Tue | 23 | Inhibition & Stroop | 2 | Nikole | 44 | H | H | .L | 20 | P | R | Tipper, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 571-590. | |||||||
| 11-Nov | Tue | 23 | c | Inhibition & Stroop | 3 | 45 | H | .L | 31 | P | R | Milliken, B., & Tipper, S. P. (1998). Attention and Inhibition. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Attention (pp. 191-221). San Diego: Psychology Press. | ||||||||
| 11-Nov | Tue | 23 | c | Inhibition & Stroop | 2 | Aarthi | 46 | H | H | .L | 32 | P | R | Logan, G. D., & Cowan, W. B. (1984). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A theory of an act of control. Psychological Review, 91, 295-327. | Delete this, too long, conclusion not that strong. | |||||
| 11-Nov | Tue | 23 | c | Inhibition & Stroop | 3 | 47 | H | .L | 17 | P | Baylis, G. C., & Driver, J. (1992). Visual parsing and response competition: The effect of grouping factors. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 145-162. | |||||||||
| 11-Nov | Tue | 23 | c | Inhibition & Stroop | 1 | Nikole | 48 | H | H | .L | 11 | P | R | Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 849-860. | ||||||
| 11-Nov | Tue | 23 | c | Inhibition & Stroop | 3 | 49 | H | .L | 71 | P | R | Logan, G. D. (1995). Linguistic and conceptual control of visual spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 28, 103-174. | ||||||||
| 13-Nov | Thu | 24 | Emotion & Attention | 1 | Jooyoung | 50 L | H | H | .L | 29 | P | Philip David Zelazo, P. D. & Cunningham, W. A. (in Press) In J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation. New York: Guilford. Executive Function: Mechanisms Underlying Emotion Regulation | ||||||||
| 18-Nov | Tue | 25 | Conciousness | 2 | Dan | 51 | H | H | .L | 18 | P | R | Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. In R. J. Davidson, G. E. Schwartz, & D. Shaprio (Eds.), Consciousness and self-regulation. (Vol. 4, pp. 1-18). New York: Plenum. | |||||||
| 18-Nov | Tue | 25 | c | Conciousness | 1 | Dan | 85 | H | H | .L | P | Baars & Gage 2007 Ch 8 Attention & Conciousness | ||||||||
| 18-Nov | Tue | 25 | c | Conciousness | 3 | 52 | H | .L | 6 | P | Block, N (2005) Two neural correlates of consciousness. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences.9(2) 46-52 | |||||||||
| 18-Nov | Tue | 25 | c | Conciousness | 3 | 53 | H | .L | 8 | P | Shallice, T & Burgess, P (1996) The domain supervisory processes and temporal organization of behavior. Phil. Trans. Royal Society Lundon, 351, 1405-1412 | |||||||||
| 20-Nov | Thu | 26 | Neuro Models Attention | 1 | Kristine | 54 | H | H | .L | 7 | P | Shipp, S. (2004) Brain c rcuitry of attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 223-230 | ||||||||
| 20-Nov | Thu | 26 | c | Neuro Models Attention | 1 | Nikole | 86 | H | .L | 45 | P | Wright & Ward 2008 Ch 7 Physiology of Attention Shifts 152-197 | ||||||||
| 25-Nov | Tue | 27 | Neuro:Attention pathology | 2 | Jooyoung | 55 L | H | H | .L | 44 | P | R | Driver, J. (1998). The Neuropsychology of Spatial Attention. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Attention (pp. 297-340). San Diego: Psychology Press. | |||||||
| 25-Nov | Tue | 27 | c | Neuro:Attention pathology | 1 | Kristine | 56 | H | H | .L | 34 | P | R | Mesulam, M. M. (1985). Attention, confusional states, and neglect. In M. M. Mesulam (Ed.), Principles of behavioral neurology. Pp 125-168 Philadelphia: Davis. | ||||||
| 25-Nov | Tue | 27 | c | Neuro:Attention pathology | 3 | 57 | H | .L | 30 | P | Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193-222. | |||||||||
| 25-Nov | Tue | 27 | c | Neuro:Attention pathology | 3 | 58 | H | .L | 11 | P | R | Renyolds J.H., & Desimone, R. (2003) Interacting Roles of Attention and Visual Salience in V4 .Neuron, Vol. 37, 853–863 | ||||||||
| 25-Nov | Tue | 27 | c | Neuro:Attention pathology | 2 | Kai | 59 | H | H | .L | 11 | P | R | Renyolds J.H., & Desimone, R. (2003) Interacting Roles of Attention and Visual Salience in V4 .Neuron, Vol. 37, 853–863 | ||||||
| 25-Nov | Tue | 27 | c | Neuro: Selection | 3 | 61 | H | .L | 23 | P | R | Chelazzi, L., Duncan, J., Miller, E. K., & Desimone, R. (1988). Responses of neurons in inferior temporal cortex during memory-guided visual search. Journal of Neurophysiology, 80, 2918-2940. | ||||||||
| 25-Nov | Tue | 27 | c | Neuro: Selection | 3 | 62 | H | .L | 38 | P | P | Luck, S. J. (1998). Neurophysiology of Selective Attention. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Attention (pp. 257-295). San Diego. | ||||||||
| 25-Nov | Tue | 27 | c | Neuro: Selection | 3 | 63 | H | .L | 23 | P | R | Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (in press). Serial deployment of attention during visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance | ||||||||
| 25-Nov | Tue | 27 | c | Neuro: Selection | 3 | 64 | H | .L | 3 | P | Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (1999). Electrophysiological measurement of rapid shifts of attention during visual search. Nature, 400, 867-869. | |||||||||
| 25-Nov | Tue | 27 | c | Neuro: cortex | 3 | 65 | H | .L | 22 | P | Robertson, L., Treisman, A., Friedman-Hill, S., & Grabowecky, M. (1997). The interaction of spatial and object pathways: Evidence from Balint’s syndrome. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 295-317. | |||||||||
| 27-Nov | Thu | 28 | THANKSGIVING | |||||||||||||||||
| 2-Dec | Tue | 29 | Neuro: cortex | 2 | Aarthi | 66 | H | H | .L | 21 | P | R | Colby, C.L. (1996). Neurophysiological Distinction Between Attention and Intention. In: Attention and Performance XVI: Information Integration in Perception and Communication. J. McClelland and T. Inui (eds.), MIT Press, pp. 157-177, 1996 | |||||||
| 2-Dec | Tue | 29 | c | Neuro: cortex | 3 | 67 | H | H | .L | 31 | P | Colby, C. L., & Goldberg, M. E. (1999). Space and attention in parietal cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 22, 319-349. | ||||||||
| 2-Dec | Tue | 29 | c | Neuro: cortex | 2 | Aarthi | 68 | H | H | .L | 26 | P | R | Kastner, S., & Ungerleider, L. G. (2000). Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 23, 315-341. | ||||||
| 2-Dec | Tue | 29 | c | Neuro: cortex | 1 | Kai | 69 | H | H | .L | 15 | P | R | Corbetta, M. and G. L. Shulman (2002). "Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain." Nature Reviews Neuroscience 3(3): 201-215. | ||||||
| 2-Dec | Tue | 29 | c | Neuro: cortex | 3 | Tom | 70 | H | .L | 4 | P | Brefczynski,-Julie-A DeYoe,-Edgar-A A physiological correlate of the 'spotlight' of visual attention. Nature-Neuroscience. 1999 Apr; Vol 2(4): 370-374 | ||||||||
| 4-Dec | Thu | 30 | Models Search | 1 | Tom | 72 | H | H | .L | 38 | P | R | Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1, 202-238. | |||||||
| 4-Dec | Thu | 30 | c | Models Cortex | 2 | Jooyoung | 73 | H | H | .L | 30 | P | P | Olshausen, B. A., Anderson, C. H., & Van Essen, D. C. (1993). A neurobiological model of visual attention and invariant pattern recognition based on dynamic routing of information. Journal of Neuroscience, 13(11), 4700-4719. | ||||||
| 9-Dec | Tue | 31 | Models Production & Math Models | 2 | Kristine | 74 | H | H | .L | 62 | P | R | Meyer, D. E., & Keiras, D. E. (1997). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. Psychological Review, 104, 3-65. | |||||||
| 9-Dec | Tue | 31 | c | Models Production & Math Models | 3 | Tom | 75 | H | .L | 46 | P | R | Logan, G. D. (1996). The CODE theory of visual attention: An integration of space-based and object-based attention. Psychological Review, 103, 603-649. | |||||||
| 9-Dec | Tue | 31 | c | Models Production & Math Models | 2 | Tom | 76 | H | .L | 14 | P | R | Logan, G. D. (2004). Cumulative progress in formal theories of attention. Annual Review in Psychology, 55, 207–234. | |||||||
| 11-Dec | 32 | Exam, | 77 | H | L | Review and student experiments | ||||||||||||||
| Reading per week Required (1) 50, Skim(2) 51; Reference (3) 43 | (consider Dosher & Lu 2000) | |||||||||||||||||||