2006 Competition Results

Top 3 Winners

1. Emanuele Olivetti, Diego Sona, Sriharsha Veeramachaneni
Gaussian process regression and recurrent neural networks for fMRI image classification
ITC-IRST; Italy
Summary Page| Methods Description | Score Sheet | Poster | Slides
$10,000 First Place (US Dollars)

2. Denis Chigirev, Greg Stephens and The Princeton EBC team
Predicting Base Features with Supervoxels
Princeton University; United States of America
Summary Page | Methods Description | Score Sheet |Slides
$5,000 Second Place (US Dollars)

3. Alexis Battle, Gal Chechik, Daphne Koller
Temporal and Cross-Subject Probabilistic Models for fMRI Prediction Tasks
Stanford University; United States of America
Summary Page | Methods Description | Score Sheet | Slides
$2,000 Third Place (US Dollars)


Honorable Mentions

  • Stephen M. LaConte
    Brain Reading with Selective Training Data, Transduction, and Behavior Based Group Analysis
    Emory University; United States of America
    Summary Page| Methods Description | Score Sheet
    *Best Prediction of All Categories
  • S. Ghebreab, P. Adriaans,  A.W.M. Smeulders
    Incremental ClusterWise Regression Analysis of Functional Stimulation-Activation Data
    University of Amsterdam; Netherlands
    Summary Page | Methods Description| Score Sheet | Poster
    *Best Prediction of Actor Exemplars
  • Paul F. Rodriguez
    Fast Prediction Using Large Numbers of Voxels with Kernel Based Non-linear Partial Least Squares Regression
    University of California, Irvine; United States of America
    Summary Page | Methods Description
    | Score Sheet
    *Best Prediction of Internal Assessment

 

Top 4 - 10

4. Greg Stephens, Dennis Chigirev and The Princeton EBC team
The Power of Linear Methods
Princeton University; United State of America
Methods Description | Score Sheet

5. Dr. Janaina Mourao Miranda, Dr. John Ashburnera, Mr. Chia-Yueh Carlton Chua, Mr. Geoffrey Tama
Functional Imaging Laboratory (FIL), Center for Neuroimaging Sciences, IOP, KCL; London
Support Vector Regression and Relevance Vector Regression
Methods Description | Score Sheet | Poster

6. Vaidehi Natu, Greg Detre and the Princeton EBC team
Backpropagation neural networks and and discretized regressors
Princeton University, United State of America
Methods Description | Score Sheet

7. Paul F. Rodriguez
Fast Prediction Using Large Numbers of Voxels with Kernel Based Non-linear Partial Least Squares Regression
University of California, Irvine; United States of America
Methods Description | Score Sheet | Poster

8. István Szita
How to Select the 100 Voxels that are Best for Prediction – a Simplistic Approach
Neural Information Processing Group, Eötvös Loránd University; Hungary
Methods Description | Score Sheet

9. David S. Wack
Stochastic Discrimination and Linear Fit Approaches to PBAIC Data
University of Buffalo; United States of America
Methods Description | Score Sheet

10. Joost Wegman, Marieke van der Linden, Jaap Murre, Miranda van Turennout
Classifying subjective ratings of movie features using brain imaging data: Support Vector Regression on functional MRI
F.C. Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Nijmegen; Netherlands
Methods Description | Score Sheet

 

2006 Competition Participants (by institution)

  • John Aston
    Academia Sinica; Taiwan
    Methods Description | Score Sheet
  • Alex Harner, Okito Yamishita, Daniel Callan, Yukiyasu Kamitani
    A whole-brain correlation-based approach to decoding high-level features in fMRI data
    ATR Computation Neuroscience Laboratories; Japan
    Methods Description | Score Sheet
  • Mark Palatucci
    Carnegie Mellon University; United States of America
    Methods Description | Score Sheet
  • Indrayana Rustandi
    Support Vector Regression on Wavelet-Thresholded fMRI Data
    Carnegie Mellon University; United States of America
    Methods Description | Score Sheet
  • Haibin Huang
    Prediction of brain activity using ROIs found by neural network-based method and peak finding method
    Cleveland Clinic; United States of America
    Methods Description | Score Sheet
  • Bennett CM, Kraemer DJ, Cross ES, Tunik E, and Ortigue SN
    Subjective ratings prediction by flatmapped covariance
    Dartmouth College; United States of America
    Methods Description | Score Sheet | Poster
  • Rajan S. Patel, F. DuBois Bowman, Ying Guo, Gordana Derado
    Integrating Support Vector Machines, Supervised Principal Components, and Boosting to Interpret Brain Activity
    Emory University; United States of America
    Methods Description |Score Sheet
  • B. Douglas Ward
    Optimal Estimation of Brain Activation by Application of Kalman Filtering
    Medical College of Wisconsin; United States of America
    Methods Description | Score Sheet
  • René Weber, John Sherry, Ron Tamborini, Klaus Mathiak
    Theory Based Analysis of Emotion Relevant Show Content and Brain Activity: A Canonical Correlation Approach
    Michigan State University; United States of America
    RWTH University; Germany
    Methods Description | Score Sheet
  • SunsongYin Keming
    National University of Defense Technology; China
    Methods Description | Score Sheet
  • Shannon Hughes
    Princeton University; United State of America
    Methods Description | Score Sheet
  • Chris Moore & the Princeton EBC team
    Voxel-wise ridge regression & enforcing correlations between predictions
    Princeton University; United States of America
    Methods Description | Score Sheet
  • Vaidehi Natu
    Princeton University; United State of America
    Methods Description | Score Sheet
  • Ehren Newman, Chris Moore & the Princeton EBC team
    Independent voxel-wise ridge regression & enforcing correlations between predictions
    Princeton University; United States of America
    Methods Description | Score Sheet
  • Matthew Weber
    Princeton University; United State of America
    Methods Description | Score Sheet
  • Jeng-Ren Duann, Molly Davies, Tzyy-Ping Jung, Scott Makeig
    Independent brain responses to watching “Home Improvement”
    University of California; United States of America
    Methods Description | Score Sheet
  • Zhiqiang Bi
    University of California at Santa Barbara; United States of America
    Methods Description | Score Sheet
  • Mike Angstadt, Daniel A. Fitzgerald, Rosemary A. McCarron, K. Luan Phan
    Using Multilayer Perceptrons to predict responses from fMRI data
    University of Chicago; United States of America
    Methods Description | Score Sheet
  • F. De Martino, G. Valente, F. Esposito, R. Goebel, E. Formisano
    ‘Brain Reading’ of movie data with least squares Support Vector Machine function estimation
    University of Maastricht; Netherlands
    Methods Description | Score Sheet
  • Giancarlo Valente, Federico De Martino, Fabrizio Esposito, Rainer Goebel, Elia Formisano
    Movie Ratings prediction with SVM-based Function Estimation and Self Organizing ICA-based areas selection
    University of Maastricht; Netherlands
    Methods Description | Score Sheet
  • Mark Scully
    The Use of ICA On Source Data and kMeans On Subject Ratings As Input To Classifiers
    University of New Mexico; United States of America
    Methods Description | Score Sheet
  • David R. Hardoon & John Shawe-Taylor
    Maximum Margin Regression using KCCA Feature Projection
    University of Southampton; United Kingdom
    Methods Description | Score Sheet
  • Roberto Viviani, Tobias Wunner
    Functional Principal Component Analysis
    University of Ulm; Germany
    Methods Description | Score Sheet
  • Michael D. Fox & Abraham Z. Snyder
    Prediction of Movie Features Using Feature-Specific Right-Inverse Beta Maps
    Washington University, St. Louis; United States of America
    Methods Description | Score Sheet
 

© University of Pittsburgh
Free Web Site Counter